Overview of the Balance Sheet (Financial Position Statement)

A balance sheet – financial position statement is one of the most important financial statements. Other important financial statements include the income statement, cash flow statement and statement of changes in equity.

A balance sheet is the financial position of the company at a given point in time. It is often called a “snapshot” of the company’s financial position.

How to think about a balance sheet (financial position statement)


A good way to compare the balance sheet statement, income statement and cash-flow statement is to think of a river leading to a dam. The income statement and a cash-flow statement record the movement of money over a specific period of time. It is similar to recording the volume flowing down a river over a specific period. The balance sheet – financial position statement is the dam. Everything collects there.

Therefore, by looking at the balance sheet we can see how everything comes together at a given point in time. If the company is reporting strong cash-flow in the statement of cash-flows, then that cash must be collecting somewhere, in the balance sheet. Provided a balance sheet is constructed honestly and correctly, it is a wonderful source of information about the company. Like a dam, any poisonous material or waste, gets washed down into the balance sheet. Therefore, paying careful attention to the balance sheet (financial position statement) allows to evaluate important information about the company.

Understanding the balance sheet (financial position statement)


To understand the balance sheet (financial position statement), one first needs to understand the difference between assets and liabilities. A simple explanation is as follows: if you take an unpaid vacation or are between jobs for a while, assets will or will have the potential of adding money to your bank account every month. Liabilities, however, will deduct money from your bank.

For example, if you own a fully paid-off house, which is currently empty, this is an asset. You may choose to earn money from this asset by renting it out. Therefore, even if you are not working, you will have rental income generated from your asset. However, if you leased an expensive car and lost your job, the bank will still deduct money from your bank account every month. Therefore, this is a liability. Alternatively, if the car is fully paid-off, it is an asset and you could generate income from it.

We also can define assets and liabilities more formally.

ASSETS

Assets are any tangible or intangible economic resources that a company or individual possesses and which can be used to cover the individual’s or company’s debt. For example, in the case of an individual, retirement savings and stocks are examples of assets. In the case of a company, fully owned equipment and buildings are examples of assets.

As represented on the balance sheet, current assets are assets which are excepted to be converted into cash within 12 months and non-current assets are assets which are expected to be converted into cash at some point in the future which is longer than 12 months.

LIABILITIES

Liability is a legal obligation to settle debt which arises as a result of a past transaction or event. A liability should, by law, be settled at a specified future period or over a specified period and, possibly, at specified intervals.

As represented on the balance sheet, current liabilities are debts which must be settled within 12 months and non-current liabilities are debts which must be settled at some point in the future which is longer than 12 months.

An example of personal liability can be a personal loan that must be repaid to the bank. Company liability examples include accrued expenses such as wages as well as long-term loans.

 

Innovation and Small Business

Why do innovation and small business go together? Consider this: small businesses account for 95% of all radical innovations and for half of all innovations. Inventions such as the personal computer originated from a small business. Therefore, innovation and small business are often very much aligned and this trend is expected to continue into the future.

After all, innovation and small business have to be associated because, in many cases, one can only break into established markets and compete with the recognized giants by introducing innovative solutions to customers’ needs.

Interestingly, large organizations usually focus on improving existing solutions rather than on inventing new solutions. As Scott Anthony, co-author of the book “Seeing What’s Next: Using Theories of Innovation to Predict Industry Change”, and partner at Innosight, a Watertown (Massachusetts) Innovation consulting firm, mentioned, “The thing that’s so tricky is that everything an established company is trained to do – watch your markets carefully, listen to your best customers, innovate to meet their needs – oftentimes causes them to miss some of these disruptive transformation trends”. Moreover, large organizations are often very bureaucratic, which slows down or even kills innovation efforts of employees.

The factors above further contribute to the competitive power of innovation in small business. Small business should embrace its less bureaucratic environments and enhance its innovation efforts. However, innovation efforts of small business have to be designed carefully. The following factors should be considered within the context of innovation and small business:

Six factors to consider


1 – Entrepreneurs need to ensure that adequate financing is available or is accessible for the entire duration of the innovation effort.

2 – A new and innovative product or service must add real value to customer. Innovation can only be a successful effort if there is a demand for the new solution.

3 – It is best to choose an area in which an entrepreneur has personal experience.

4 – It is best to concentrate on products and services which are currently not available or underserved. This will allow entrepreneurs to achieve more rapid growth as well as to have less competition, at least initially.

5 – If innovative products and services is the focus of the business, than continuous innovation should be given a priority.

6 – It is advisable for innovation to be of a type that allows for further products and services to be developed based on the initial innovation.

Innovation and small business success


Due to widespread globalization and advancement in technologies, innovation is accessible to small businesses in a way that was never possible before. Innovation and small business should go together, it is the only way to establish a strong foothold in the market while competing with recognized giants.

There has never been a better time for small businesses to grow and prosper. Think about the opportunities that technology and globalization offers to small business. For example, the internet has made it possible to access markets anywhere in the world, at a very low cost. The only thing that small businesses need is a solution to customers’ needs that is new and in demand. Small business needs innovation. Therefore, innovation and small business success are also very much aligned.

The following article may be of interest to you if you would like to understand this better: “All Shook Up – You can’t control disruptive innovations, but you can learn to predict them–and to react to them in a positive way.”

 

Entrepreneur Mindset

Entrepreneurship and development go together. Learning to think like an entrepreneur, whether you run your own business or work for an organization, is a critical skill to be successful in business.

Entrepreneurs need to have a mix of skills at hand: knowledge of marketing, leadership, basic finance, operations, talent management, business management, technology and other skills. They need to have these skills since initially their companies usually consist of 1 or 2 employees and they do not have the luxury of having specialists.

Learning enough of these skills will give you an advantage. You do not need to be an expert in all of these areas. You just need to have a basic knowledge and be able to see an opportunity from all angles so you can have an overall picture. An entrepreneur’s mindset is a great advantage in business. Thinking like an entrepreneur forces you to look for opportunities which otherwise can be overlooked.

If you surveyed employers today, the vast majority would say they wish their employees were more entrepreneurial. This has been something employers have sought for the last 20 years and it will continue to be highly sought after.

There is another more compelling reason to think like an entrepreneur. No matter how happy you may be in your career today, there will likely come a time when you will want to make a change. This could be due to having a terrible manager, poor working conditions, a faltering company or you may just have outgrown your job. Either way, you need to have options. Thinking like an entrepreneur and having the skills of one, allows you to see opportunities and to exploit them.

Reasons to act like an entrepreneur


1 – One of the reasons is because you need to keep your options open to someday run your own business.

On average, you will never be as wealthy as you could be by working for someone else.

Moreover, you never will be “FREE” and, at some point in your career, being “FREE” may become a requirement for you rather than a preference. This happens very often with successful employees of corporations of all sizes and types. Consequently, many of them leave to start their own businesses to satisfy their need for freedom, personal satisfaction, the feeling of building something of their own and the opportunity to spend more time with family, amongst others.

2 – You need to learn to think like an owner and entrepreneur. If you adapt your attitude and acquire a feeling of accountability that comes with being an owner – you will stand out amongst peers and have a greater chance for accelerated career development.

3 – Learning to think like an entrepreneur helps you to see the big picture and this is crucial for your career development. The higher you move up along your business career ladder, the more conceptual skills you will need and the less technical skills you will need. Conceptual skills refer to the ability to think strategically and see the big picture.

Entrepreneurship, DEVELOPMENT and Innovation


It can also be argued that entrepreneurship and development of the economy as a whole go together. The distinguished Harvard economist Joseph Schumpeter argued that capitalism exists in the state of “creative destruction”, where innovation leads to new companies replacing old ones. Entrepreneurship leads to development. He viewed entrepreneurship as a catalyst for growth of the economy. He argued that it is entrepreneurs who are the driver for the sustainable long-term growth of the economy. Therefore, he argued that entrepreneurship and development of the economy are inseparable.

***

Most employees know their job well, but they are weak at understanding the overall business. Acquiring the mindset of an entrepreneur will allow you to see the big picture. You can set yourself apart.

 

The economic policy and special interest groups

Yet another sub-group that influences the economic policy decision-making process is special interest groups. Individuals with similar interests form a special interest group which makes them more powerful in influencing the decision-making on economic policy and other issues. The beneficial factors of special interest groups within context of economic policy decision making is supported by pluralism, which is a model of economic policy making.

Special interest groups that exert an influence on economic policy decision-making include three main sub-groups:

  • organized business groups
  • non-governmental organizations
  • organized labor groups

Examples of organized business groups include organized business and agriculture. Examples of non-governmental groups include educational and welfare organizations. Examples of organized labor groups include trade unions.

Other interest groups that exert an influence on economic policy decision-making include international financial organizations such as the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) as well as media and foreign governments.

Some individuals hold the opinion that special interest groups are excessive in their quantity and pressure on the government to influence decisions concerning economic policy. They feel that such pressure and “disproportionate” influence only complicates and slows down the decision-making process with regards to the economic policy.

Nevertheless, each special interest group is an important constituent influencing government with regards to economic policy decision-making process. According to pluralism, one of the models of economic policy making, the role of each interest group is crucial along with roles of a technocrat, a political leader and a bureaucrat.

On the flip side of the coin, special interest groups are also seen to have a beneficial influence within context of economic policy decision making. They serve as a watchdog of the government’s actions (e.g. actions of politicians, technocrats and bureaucrats) and of building important networks within communities or regions.

 

A bureaucrat and bureaucrat’s role in setting the economic policy

A bureaucrat is a constituent of a bureaucracy. Bureaucracy is usually means governments but can also refer to specific organizations. As an example, a large private organization is also a bureaucracy and an individual working for such an entity is a bureaucrat.

Bureaucrat, as a word, originated from the French word bureau, which means “desk”. This name was selected because bureaucrats are seen as individuals who work behind the desk.

However, here we are concerned with a bureaucrat who is an employee of the government and an economic policy decision-making participant.

A bureaucrat is an agent of a political leader (principal) and he or she implements policy choices of politicians. One of the big differences between a politician and a bureaucrat is that the latter is appointed and the former is elected. Some bureaucrats are technocrats. Technocrats are professionals, such as economists and engineers, who advise politicians on the areas of their expertise. For example, economists may advise on economic policy choices.

Bureaucrats are often driven by motives other than being a faithful servant (agent) of politicians (principals). A bureaucrat is a human being with his or her own agendas, desires and ambitions. Along with meritorious motives, he or she may be driven to maximize income, status and power or to advance his or her career.

In the economic theory, it is assumed that a bureaucrat is driven to maximize his or her budget. This occurs because the bigger the budget that a bureaucrat controls, the bigger the perceived power and the status and, thus, satisfaction of a bureaucrat.

Therefore, bureaucrats have an incentive to arrange for a budget which is above the optimal (most effective) budget level and this leads to excessive spending by government. In the pursuit of enlarging the budget, a bureaucrat may exaggerate benefits and downplay costs and threats.

Blogbschool.com is powered by www.firmsconsulting.com. Firmsconsulting is a training company that finds and nurtures tomorrow’s leaders in business, government and academia via bespoke online training to develop one’s executive presence, critical thinking abilities, high performance skill-set, and strategy, operations and implementation capabilities. Learn more at www.firmsconsulting.com.

Sign up to receive a 3-part FREE strategy video training series here.

A political leader and his role in setting the economic policy

The word Politician, a political leader, originated from the Greek word “Polis”. A politician is an individual who affects public decisions, such as decisions on the economic policy. A politician is either an individual who already serves in a government or which seeks to be elected to serve their nation or community.

The role of a politician in setting the economic policy is very prominent. According to standard economic theory, technocrats (e.g. economists) provide recommendations on the economic policy choices to a political leader who, in turn, make economic policy choices which are implemented by a bureaucrat.

Therefore, a politican is actually involved in making the economic policy choices. This is different from bureaucrats who implement the policy choices of politicians.

A politician, as a role player in the government, earns some resentment from the general public due to the perception that politicians are driven by desire to maximize votes for their next election rather than by serving the interests of the public. This is, of course, true in some cases and not in others.

Political business cycle theories (models)


A politician is a human being and has feelings, dreams, goals, desires and agendas, like any other person from any walk of life. Therefore, it is only natural that a politician may be driven by a personal agenda. This must always be kept in mind. Especially since standard economic theory assumes that a political leader is driven by the goal of enhancing the well-being of a nation rather than by desire of personal gains.

Some economic theories, however, attempt to explain a politician’s actions as guided by attempt to maximize votes. Such theories are called political business cycle theories. Political business cycle theories are further subdivided into the partisan model and opportunistic model.

PARTISAN MODEL

Based on a politician being a “partisan” of the party that he or she belongs to. Each party has different priorities and those priorities will significantly influence the economic policy decisions.

OPPORTUNISTIC MODEL

This theory was first proposed by Nordhaus. Nordhaus suggests that his proposed theory rests on 3 assumptions:

1 – The main goal of a politician is to stay in the office

2 – The current performance of the economy will affect election

3 – A politician has strong incentives to make economic policy decisions which will lead to expansionary monetary and fiscal policy to expand performance of the economy in the short run. This will be followed by contractionary monetary and fiscal policies to combat inflation (which occurred due to expansionary policies).

The criticism of the opportunistic model arises because it is unlikely that a political leader will be able to effectively manipulate economic performance in the short-term.

Empirical evidence does not explicitly and completely support models of the political business cycle.

 

The economic policy decisions: who is behind them?

We mentioned in the introduction to the economic policy that economic policy is a purposeful action (or purposeful non-action) by the government with the intent to affect economic behavior with the goal of achieving certain outcomes which will improve the material well-being of society. However, of what does government consists? Who really makes the decisions on economic policy?

It is generally accepted in the conventional economic theory that economists (technocrats) advice politicians with regard to the economic policy choices. Politicians than make economic policy choices which are implemented by public workers (bureaucrats).

Each of these sub-groups of the government have their own motivation behind making certain policy decisions and their motives must be recognized. A political leader (policy maker), for example, is generally motivated to increase his or her votes and to stay in the power. A bureaucrat is usually motivated to increase his or her budget which will increase his or her power.

Government sub-groups consist of real people with their own agendas, motives and goals, which are sometimes not aligned with the assumption the government always acts in the national interest with the goal of achieving economic stability and prosperity. This will distort the effectiveness and appropriateness of the economic policy choices.

Now let’s take a look at some sub-groups of the government which are involved in economic policy decision making.

In the articles that follow we will take a closer look at different groups which influence economic policy decisions. We will particularly discuss a political leader’s role and political business cycle theories. We will also take a closer look at the role of a bureaucrat, including the role of a technocrat, and their role in the economic policy decision making. Lastly we will address the role of the special interest groups within the context of their influence on the economic policy decision making.

Later, when we will discuss four models of economic policy making, we will look at the role of each constituent within each model in more aggregated format. However, we will start from looking at their roles in isolation:

The role of a political leader in setting economic policy is very prominent. According to standard economic theory, technocrats (economists) provide recommendations on economic policy choices to a political leader or group of politicians who, in turn, make economic policy choices which are implemented by bureaucrats.

The role of a bureaucrat in setting economic policy is instrumental. A bureaucrat is an individual who essentially implements economic policy set by politicians.

Special interest groups that exert an influence on economic policy decision-making include three main sub-groups: organized business groups, non-governmental organizations and organized labor groups.

***

You may read this related article entitled “Who is behind Bush economic policy” for deeper understanding of how economic policy decisions are made in the real world.

Blogbschool.com is powered by www.firmsconsulting.com. Firmsconsulting is a training company that finds and nurtures tomorrow’s leaders in business, government and academia via bespoke online training to develop one’s executive presence, critical thinking abilities, high performance skill-set, and strategy, operations and implementation capabilities. Learn more at www.firmsconsulting.com.

Sign up to receive a 3-part FREE strategy video training series here.

The economic policy

The economic policy is a purposeful action (or purposeful non-action) by government with the intent to affect economic behavior with the goal of achieving certain outcomes which will improve the material well-being of society.

Policy, according to the Oxford Dictionary, is defined as the “course or general plan of action adopted by government”.

There are active and passive elements in economic policy:

Active element occurs when purposeful action is planned and implemented.

Passive element occurs when policy makers purposefully decide not to take any action with regards to specific economic problems.

Three types of objectives are important for economic policy.

These objectives are macroeconomic, sectoral or microeconomic in nature. Because of the scarcity of resources available, only some of the goals can be achieved and, therefore, ranking of the goals in terms of priority may be necessary when making choices with regards to economic policy.

Macroeconomic objectives of economic policy attend to issues that affect economy as a whole. Examples are combating unemployment, poverty and inflation, enhancing economic growth and achieving balance of payments stability.

Microeconomic objectives of economic policy attend to issues that affect specific individual entities within the economy, such as individual organizations. Microeconomic objectives of economic policy also attend to issues which affect particular markets. An example of the microeconomic objective of economic policy may be addressing negative externalities in the market.

Sectoral objectives of economic policy may include:

1 – Development of economic and social sectors. Economic sectors include such sectors as manufacturing, mining and construction and social sectors include health and education.

2 – Cross-sectoral development (eg promoting foreign trade) and multi-sectoral development (developing regions of the country).

 

Weighted Marginal Cost of Capital (WMCC) and Investment Opportunities Schedule

By finding all break points, we can construct the weighted marginal cost of capital – WMCC – schedule. (WMCC) schedules show the relationship between the level of total new financing and a company’s weighted average cost of capital.

Thereafter, we can construct the investment opportunities schedule (IOS), which is a graph where the business’s investment opportunities are ranked based on their returns and financing required, arranged from the highest returns and all the way to the lowest returns. It is the decreasing function of the level of total financing.

If we combine the weighted marginal cost of capital (WMCC) schedule and investment opportunities schedule (IOS), we can use it to make investment decisions. The rule is to invest in projects up to the point on the graph where marginal return from investment equals its WMCC (where IOS=WMCC).

All projects on the left of the point where IOS=WMCC will maximize shareholders wealth and all points on the right of the point where IOS=WMCC will decrease shareholders’ wealth.

It is important to note that the majority of firms stop investing before the marginal return from investment equals its weighted marginal cost of capital (WMCC). Therefore, the majority of businesses prefer a capital rationing position (the position below the optimal investment budget, which is also called the optimal capital budget).

Test yourself


ABC Company has to make an investment of $1,000,000. The long-term debt weight in the capital structure is 35%. ABC has $700,000 of retained earnings but 50% of it must be paid to common stock shareholders in the form of dividends. Preferred stock is currently not used as a source of finance by ABC.

What are the weights that ABC will have for each source of capital?

SOLUTION:

Firstly, we need to find out how much of retained earnings ABC has left after payment of dividends to shareholders: $700,000*0.5=$350,000.

Therefore, the weight of retained earnings is 35% ($350,000 out of $1,000,000).

$1,000,000-$350,000 (35%, funds available from long-term debt source) – $350,000 (35%, funds available from retained earnings) = $300,000 (30%)

Therefore, the weights are as follows:

Long-term debt – 40%

Retained earnings – 35%

Common stock – 30%

Blogbschool.com is powered by www.firmsconsulting.com. Firmsconsulting is a training company that finds and nurtures tomorrow’s leaders in business, government and academia via bespoke online training to develop one’s executive presence, critical thinking abilities, high performance skill-set, and strategy, operations and implementation capabilities. Learn more at www.firmsconsulting.com.

Sign up to receive a 3-part FREE strategy video training series here.

Weighted Marginal Cost of Capital (WMCC)

Weighted Marginal Cost of Capital – WMCC – is the WACC applicable to the next dollar of the total new financing. Related to the concept is the break point concept. Weighted average cost of capital (WACC) may change over time due to changes in the volume of financing. This occurs as the volume of financing increases, the risk increases and providers of funds require higher return on the funds that they make available.

The WACC of the next dollar of the total financing may be different from the WACC of the last dollar of the total financing.

Related articles: Break Point, Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)

Blogbschool.com is powered by www.firmsconsulting.com. Firmsconsulting is a training company that finds and nurtures tomorrow’s leaders in business, government and academia via bespoke online training to develop one’s executive presence, critical thinking abilities, high performance skill-set, and strategy, operations and implementation capabilities. Learn more at www.firmsconsulting.com.

Sign up to receive a 3-part FREE strategy video training series here.